Mark Glaze, senior adviser to Guns Down with fake "facts".
Dana Loesch, NRA Spokesperson with honest facts
(My personal political message is below the first videos)
A Pro-Gun Centrist Democrat
Truth VS. Fiction
A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government. -George Washington-
Good Guy with a Gun
If you want to have and keep the right to own and carry a gun, and also the gun you want, then you better think carefully before you vote.
You often hear anti-gun politicians say they just want "sensible gun laws", but it's clear what they really want, through the laws they propose, is to get rid of as many guns as they can, for some this means all guns if they could. They say it's all in the name of reducing "gun violence". The term "gun violence" is meant to deceive you, we don't say club violence, stabbing violence, choking violence or name any other violence by the tool used, because it's ridiculous and it's just as ridiculous to say "gun violence". It's clear that it's just a political tactic to make you afraid of guns when it's violence, not the tool used, that you should be concerned with. With violence, you can't expect to get a reduction in it by changing the tools used. If the root of violence isn't what is changed then the violence remains.
They count all homicides by gun as if they were all murder and only occurred because a gun was used. Some even outright call total gun deaths, gun murders. When a gun is used for lawful self-defense of anyone, they count that against the gun. When someone commits
suicide with a gun, it's the guns fault. It's the gun, not the responsible person, who's to blame when an accident occurs with one. For some, even with police shooting deaths, it's the gun that's to blame.
They want to make you afraid that without their laws criminals are getting or will get guns and harm you. Consider this; criminals don't obey laws by definition, so if guns, their use, magazines, accessories, and types of ammunition are heavily restricted, who do you think is at a disadvantage, the criminals who will get guns to commit crimes anyway or the honest citizens who obey the law? How many people who have had crimes committed against them, are severely injured or even die at the hands of criminals, would not have if they had a gun to defend themselves. Those that can defend themselves are the ones who are less likely to be victims.
The guns they target most are "assault rifles", (semi-auto rifles similar to, mistaken for or implied to be machine guns), yet for murders, any rifle, nevermind "assault rifles" are among the least used weapons, you are more likely to be beaten to death than killed with any type of rifle. They claim an AR15 is "weapon of war", even though it's not a machine gun like the military versions, and the round used in it is a logistical compromise rather than the more powerful rounds of the military's past main battle rifles, most hunting rifles are significantly more powerful and deadly. So why is it the number one type of gun they target to reduce "gun violence"? It should make you wonder if they're really trying to reduce violence or just trying to use it as a boogieman to scare you, so they'll have something they can claim to protect you from to get your vote.
When these politicians lie, misrepresent facts, or don't even care what the real facts are, they show that they are willing to deceive you to get your vote. So if your candidate says they just want "sensible gun laws" you should find out for yourself before you vote what they really want and is what they propose actually sensible in the face of the true and complete facts, because after you vote it's too late.
Copyright © AR.Life, Gun.Vote, Pro-Gun.Democrat
All Rights Reserved